<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>TechEye - Latest Security headlines</title>
    <link>http://www.techeye.net/security</link>
    <description>Feeling insecure? Fear is a great motivator. Get the latest IT security news and analysis from the TechEye team.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <language>en-GB</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:06:08 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.techeye.net/techeye/security" /><feedburner:info uri="techeye/security" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
      <title>Foxconn hacked by SwaggSec</title>
      <description>Hacking group Swagg Security said that it had broken into Foxconn's network and found usernames and passwords for vendors that could be used to place fraudulent orders for companies like Apple and Microsoft.</description>
      <link>http://feeds.techeye.net/~r/techeye/security/~3/acYWNB4jWlE/foxconn-hacked-by-swaggsec</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techeye.net/security/foxconn-hacked-by-swaggsec</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:06:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Security</category>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hacking group</strong>&nbsp;Swagg Security said that it had broken into <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/company/foxconn">Foxconn's</a> network and found usernames and passwords for vendors that could be used to place fraudulent orders for companies like <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/company/apple">Apple</a> and <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/company/microsoft">Microsoft</a>.</p>
<p>Swagg Security  said that it was "considerably disappointed" with the inhuman working conditions at Foxconn, although that did not appear to be the main reason for the hack.</p>
<p>It said that it was a hacktivist group but was a Greyhat organisation.</p>
<p>SwaggSec alleged that it had bypassed Foxconn's firewall "almost flawlessly." They dumped "most of everything of significance," including usernames and passwords which  "could allow individuals to make fraudulent orders under big companies like Microsoft, Apple, <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/company/ibm">IBM</a>, <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/company/intel">Intel</a>, and <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/company/dell">Dell</a>."</p>
<p>According to <em><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/12/02/09/alleged_foxconn_hack_allowed_bogus_orders_to_be_placed_for_vendors.html" target="_blank">Apple Insider</a></em>, Foxconn administrators took down services.foxconn.com. SwaggSec said on Twitter it guessed "you guys made one too many orders".</p>
<p>We had been expecting more hacks to target Foxconn after Apple fanboys the <em>New York Times</em>&nbsp;started to question if the company was an Apple sweatshop.</p>
<p>Today, protesters are expected to hold a demonstration outside of Apple's Grand Central Terminal store. They will hand out petitions calling for Apple, one of Foxconn's biggest clients, and Foxconn to improve working conditions.<span>&nbsp;</span></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=acYWNB4jWlE:yz8QM7dAtBo:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=acYWNB4jWlE:yz8QM7dAtBo:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=acYWNB4jWlE:yz8QM7dAtBo:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=acYWNB4jWlE:yz8QM7dAtBo:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=acYWNB4jWlE:yz8QM7dAtBo:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=acYWNB4jWlE:yz8QM7dAtBo:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=acYWNB4jWlE:yz8QM7dAtBo:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=acYWNB4jWlE:yz8QM7dAtBo:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=acYWNB4jWlE:yz8QM7dAtBo:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techeye/security/~4/acYWNB4jWlE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator>Edward Berridge</dc:creator>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://news.techeye.net/security/foxconn-hacked-by-swaggsec</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft admits Xbox hacks</title>
      <description>Software giant Microsoft has admitted that users of its Xbox Live network are being hacked, but denies that it is any hardware, software or networking flaw.</description>
      <link>http://feeds.techeye.net/~r/techeye/security/~3/h9V7uTVUfRg/microsoft-admits-xbox-hacks</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techeye.net/security/microsoft-admits-xbox-hacks</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:35:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Security</category>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Software giant</strong> <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/company/microsoft">Microsoft</a> has admitted that users of its <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/product/xbox">Xbox</a> Live network are being hacked, but denies that it is any hardware, software or networking flaw.</p>
<p>Instead, Microsoft thinks that its customers are having their accounts hijacked by cyber criminals.</p>
<p>According to the&nbsp;<em><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/games/blogs/screenplay/microsoft-acknowledges-xbox-live-hijacks-20120209-1rkd7.html#ixzz1lsU4MilI" target="_blank">Sydney Morning Herald, </a></em>the situation is being watched closely because insecurity experts have been waiting for another <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/product/playstation-network">PlayStation Network</a> security breach to happen.  In that case, millions of customer accounts were made public and the network was shut down for a month.</p>
<p>While it might have been a bit tighter on security than <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/company/sony">Sony</a>, Microsoft has been slow to publicly address hijacked Xbox Live accounts.</p>
<p>But Xbox Live users who have had their accounts compromised and facilitated to make unauthorised transactions have been moaning for months. They say Microsoft has been slow to assist customers and restore access to their accounts.</p>
<p>Last month,  Redmond improved security on its Xbox.com website, which seems to have been how hackers got access to user account information.</p>
<p>The general manager of Xbox Live Alex Garden penned an open letter about security on Xbox Live that acknowledged "account hijacking across the internet continues to grow".</p>
<p>Garden described how there was a surge of personal information being compromised and sold but Microsoft said that there was no evidence of a security breach in the Xbox Live service.</p>
<p>Microsoft says the most common sources of security attack are social engineering, phishing, malware and using the same passwords.<span>&nbsp;</span></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=h9V7uTVUfRg:IUFE7K7sYrc:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=h9V7uTVUfRg:IUFE7K7sYrc:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=h9V7uTVUfRg:IUFE7K7sYrc:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=h9V7uTVUfRg:IUFE7K7sYrc:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=h9V7uTVUfRg:IUFE7K7sYrc:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=h9V7uTVUfRg:IUFE7K7sYrc:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=h9V7uTVUfRg:IUFE7K7sYrc:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=h9V7uTVUfRg:IUFE7K7sYrc:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=h9V7uTVUfRg:IUFE7K7sYrc:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techeye/security/~4/h9V7uTVUfRg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator>Nick Farrell</dc:creator>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://news.techeye.net/security/microsoft-admits-xbox-hacks</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Home Office urged for transparency on spyware industry</title>
      <description>The UK's government has been criticised by privacy groups over a lack of transparency about its involvement in the surveillance industry.</description>
      <link>http://feeds.techeye.net/~r/techeye/security/~3/EcukUYc9moA/home-office-urged-for-transparency-on-spyware-industry</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techeye.net/security/home-office-urged-for-transparency-on-spyware-industry</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:38:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Security</category>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The UK's government&nbsp;</strong>has been criticised by privacy groups over a lack of transparency about its involvement in the surveillance industry.</p>
<p>A report <a href="http://news.techeye.net/security/western-governments-eye-up-the-latest-spy-kit" target="_blank">released yesterday</a> showed that government agencies around the world are attending events and trade shows with the latest in surveillance technology.</p>
<p>From large scale organisations to the small, attendees at ISS World can buy up the latest surveillance and monitoring technology.&nbsp; A <a href="http://projects.wsj.com/surveillance-catalog/attendees/" target="_blank">joint report</a> from the <em>Wall Street Journal </em>and Privacy International showed that even some rather surprising attendees, such as the Strathclyde Police and The US Fish and Wildlife Service, also turn up - paying over a thousand dollars per head for the privilege.</p>
<p>The Home Office has attended ISS World events in the past.&nbsp; <em>TechEye</em>&nbsp;asked the Home Office to explain the purpose for the visits but were told that, for &ldquo;operational reasons&rdquo;, it could not comment.</p>
<p>The Home Office says that such visits are a matter of course, saying that &ldquo;officials attend meetings like this and others as routine&rdquo;.</p>
<p>Privacy advocates at Big Brother Watch questioned the necessity for the UK government to attend such events, and called for more transparency over attendance.</p>
<p>Deputy director of the group Emma Carr said, speaking to <em>TechEye</em>: "Questions need to be asked as to why individual police forces, such as Strathclyde Police, would need to attend a conference that features training sessions on &lsquo;online social media and internet investigations&rsquo; and &lsquo;exploiting computer and mobile vulnerabilities for electronic surveillance&rsquo;".</p>
<p>Carr continued: &ldquo;In the past ten years there have been millions of interceptions of communications, but only a tiny fraction are ever authorised by a court.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Carr believes that with technology advancing at such a rate, the government needs to be clear about its surveillance powers. Big Brother Watch suggests the UK needs a "proper regulatory system in place to protect privacy and civil liberties".</p>
<p>&ldquo;The public can&rsquo;t have faith that these powers are being used properly if the government fails to be transparent in its attendance at such events,&rdquo; Carr told us.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The number of people attending these conferences demonstrates the enthusiasm for using more intrusive technology," she said. "It is far from certain that Britain has suitable regulation in place to ensure it is used proportionately and in appropriate situations.&rdquo;</p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=EcukUYc9moA:KT-DlOCp3BQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=EcukUYc9moA:KT-DlOCp3BQ:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=EcukUYc9moA:KT-DlOCp3BQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=EcukUYc9moA:KT-DlOCp3BQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=EcukUYc9moA:KT-DlOCp3BQ:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=EcukUYc9moA:KT-DlOCp3BQ:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=EcukUYc9moA:KT-DlOCp3BQ:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=EcukUYc9moA:KT-DlOCp3BQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=EcukUYc9moA:KT-DlOCp3BQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techeye/security/~4/EcukUYc9moA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator>Matthew Finnegan</dc:creator>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://news.techeye.net/security/home-office-urged-for-transparency-on-spyware-industry</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Homeland security wants to take over your network</title>
      <description>The Department of Homeland Security has decided that US companies are not good enough at running their network security and it wants to take them over.</description>
      <link>http://feeds.techeye.net/~r/techeye/security/~3/5WpA5UCFLdg/homeland-security-wants-to-take-over-your-network</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techeye.net/security/homeland-security-wants-to-take-over-your-network</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:00:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Security</category>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Department of Homeland Security</strong>&nbsp;has decided that US companies are not good enough at running their network security and it wants to take them over.</p>
<p>According to<em><a href="http://blogs.cio.com/security/16787/law-would-put-homeland-security-charge-business-it-security" target="_blank"> CIO Today</a></em>, under a cunning plan being looked at by the US Senate, the DHS thinks that if it runs every corporate network in the Land of the Free the country will be much safer.</p>
<p>We guess it will also mean that the government can constantly monitor corporate emails for other threats.</p>
<p>Under the move, the same brains who have screwed up US tourism with their bizarre paranoia and obsessive desire to see you naked,  the TSA would take over each company's security.  We guess that means that you will not be able to turn on your computer without having your testicles fondled in the search for explosives.</p>
<p>To be fair Congress is only suggesting the nightmare scenario for outfits who run life-sustaining services, and if hackers got in could create catastrophic economic damage or severe degradation of national security capabilities.</p>
<p>The idea is being pushed by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and is supported by the White House.  However it has still got to go to consultation and we can't see the corporate interests which run the US allowing this one through.<span>&nbsp;</span></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=5WpA5UCFLdg:y6LM9-mjj-k:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=5WpA5UCFLdg:y6LM9-mjj-k:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=5WpA5UCFLdg:y6LM9-mjj-k:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=5WpA5UCFLdg:y6LM9-mjj-k:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=5WpA5UCFLdg:y6LM9-mjj-k:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=5WpA5UCFLdg:y6LM9-mjj-k:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=5WpA5UCFLdg:y6LM9-mjj-k:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=5WpA5UCFLdg:y6LM9-mjj-k:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=5WpA5UCFLdg:y6LM9-mjj-k:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techeye/security/~4/5WpA5UCFLdg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator>Nick Farrell</dc:creator>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://news.techeye.net/security/homeland-security-wants-to-take-over-your-network</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Symantec's PCAnywhere becomes PCEverywhere</title>
      <description>A hacker affiliated with Anonymous has posted the PCAnywhere source code after failing to wrangle fifty grand from Symantec.</description>
      <link>http://feeds.techeye.net/~r/techeye/security/~3/OjiXornL5UQ/symantecs-pcanywhere-becomes-pceverywhere</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techeye.net/security/symantecs-pcanywhere-becomes-pceverywhere</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:42:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Security</category>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A hacker affiliated</strong>&nbsp;with Anonymous has posted the PCAnywhere source code after failing to wrangle fifty grand from <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/company/symantec">Symantec</a>.</p>
<p>After being responsible for some true hilarity last week after <a href="http://news.techeye.net/security/anonymous-leaves-fbi-scotland-yard-utterly-red-faced" target="_blank">listening in on FBI/Scotland Yard attempts to hunt the group down</a>, another side of Anonymous was on show in what appeared to be negotiations to extort cash. Later the hacker said asking for money was an attempt to show up Symantec. Symantec claimed the emails were a fake.</p>
<p>A torrent has been posted on ThePirateBay, with a claim that Symantec had been misleading its customers over risks:</p>
<p>"Symantec has been lying to its customers. We exposed this point thus spreading the world that ppl need" - #AntiSec #Anonymous Spread and share!"</p>
<p>A copy of the email chain in which Symantec employee Sam Thomas allegedly tried to come to an arrangement to destroy the code - said to have been obtained back in 2006 - was also posted.</p>
<p>As you can <a href="http://pastebin.com/GJEKf1T9" target="_blank">see here</a>, if true, demanding cash from a large company is slightly more laborious than you might imagine, with the mundane specifics of transferring the dough snagging the deal.</p>
<p>YamaTough demanded that $50,000 - the price Symantec allegedly put on its source code - was given to an offshore account, and quick. Symantec, for its part, was allegedly adamant that it would take a few days to get the deal signed off by all necessary and get it passed through its financial office. &nbsp; A drip-feed pay plan was put forward, but YamaTough became impatient and it looks like negotiations broke down.</p>
<p>Just over a week ago, Symantec claimed it was safe to use a patched version of PCAnywhere. Clearly, everything has gone from bad to much, much worse. YamaTough says he is in possession of other source codes, too, and that they will appear on the black market at auction.</p>
<p>Security expert at <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/company/sophos">Sophos</a>, Graham Cluley, believes that it is a threat which faces all firms, and it is a constant battle to stay one step ahead of hackers.</p>
<p>&ldquo;Any companies which believe they are totally,one hundred percent secure are losing the battle as there is no room for complacency,&rdquo; he told <em>TechEye</em>.</p>
<p>&ldquo;The good news for Symantec is that they have been very clear and upfront in telling users to stop using PCAnywhere, and released a patch. &nbsp;They have been quite open about how users can protect themselves. It was a bold move and can&rsquo;t have been comfortable, as it is certainly not a normal marketing message to be putting out there.&rdquo;</p>
<p>As to whether Anonymous is able to claim the moral high-ground, Cluley believes it is just Symantec which has acted correctly: &ldquo;If Anonymous are saying that Symantec has not been clear with its users then that is up to them to show some evidence.</p>
<p>&ldquo;However," Clulely continued, "there is ultimately one group here which has committed a criminal act, and in accessing the source code, this is what Anonymous have done.&rdquo;</p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=OjiXornL5UQ:7Dms95kMSaI:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=OjiXornL5UQ:7Dms95kMSaI:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=OjiXornL5UQ:7Dms95kMSaI:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=OjiXornL5UQ:7Dms95kMSaI:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=OjiXornL5UQ:7Dms95kMSaI:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=OjiXornL5UQ:7Dms95kMSaI:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=OjiXornL5UQ:7Dms95kMSaI:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=OjiXornL5UQ:7Dms95kMSaI:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=OjiXornL5UQ:7Dms95kMSaI:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techeye/security/~4/OjiXornL5UQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator>Matthew Finnegan</dc:creator>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://news.techeye.net/security/symantecs-pcanywhere-becomes-pceverywhere</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Western governments eye up the latest spy kit</title>
      <description>A report has shown that western government agencies are attending surveillance trade shows where they rub shoulders with countries that have histories of spying on their citizens.</description>
      <link>http://feeds.techeye.net/~r/techeye/security/~3/5t8GQNq4ETQ/western-governments-eye-up-the-latest-spy-kit</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techeye.net/security/western-governments-eye-up-the-latest-spy-kit</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:15:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Security</category>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A report has shown</strong>&nbsp;that western government agencies are attending surveillance trade shows where they rub shoulders with countries that have histories of spying on their citizens.</p>
<p>According to a joint report released by Privacy international and the <em>Wall Street Journal,&nbsp;</em>government agencies in the UK - such as the Home Office and SOCA - have been attending the ISS World.</p>
<p>Other attendees include intelligence agency GCHQ, the Ministry of Defence and the Embassy of the UK. Even Strathclyde Police has been shelling out on the $1,295 per head fee to attend the shows. &nbsp;<em>TechEye</em> has approached the Home Office but it is keeping quiet.</p>
<p>Privacy International points out it is not just the FBI that is looking at the latest in spyware, there are also small town police forces and even the US Fish and Wildlife Service, engaged as it is in the pursuit of underwater espionage.</p>
<p>At the events listed, going back to 2006, this means rubbing shoulders with some countries that have earned reputations for human rights abuses such as Libya and Egypt.</p>
<p>The sort of products on offer include devices and programs that can intercept mobile phone calls or text messages on a mass scale, or malware and spyware that can take over computers.</p>
<p>The events, held in Washington DC, Dubai and Prague from 2006 to 2009, also cover talks and seminars with titles such as &ldquo;Wiretapping &ndash; understanding the basics&rdquo;.</p>
<p>Quite why some police departments in the US with less than five staff, covering a rural area of roughly one thousand people would need to get their hand on such equipment is unclear.&nbsp; It certainly illuminates an industry which is offering some heavy duty monitoring equipment to those willing to spend the cash.</p>
<p>There has been plenty of controversy over western firms<a href="http://news.techeye.net/business/french-firm-amesys-provided-spy-capabilities-to-libya" target="_blank"> readily supplying surveillance equipment </a>to regimes with shady track records. <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/company/wikileaks">Wikileaks</a> most recently drummed up a storm when it said every country in the world is interested <a href="http://news.techeye.net/security/wikileaks-cables-shows-the-world-its-being-watched-always" target="_blank">in grey area monitoring equipment</a>.</p>
<p>While the ISS World might shy away from media contact &ndash; banning journalists from attending events &ndash; it seems that the surveillance industry is set to continue to grow.</p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=5t8GQNq4ETQ:UWkoQLUkHsw:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=5t8GQNq4ETQ:UWkoQLUkHsw:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=5t8GQNq4ETQ:UWkoQLUkHsw:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=5t8GQNq4ETQ:UWkoQLUkHsw:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=5t8GQNq4ETQ:UWkoQLUkHsw:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=5t8GQNq4ETQ:UWkoQLUkHsw:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=5t8GQNq4ETQ:UWkoQLUkHsw:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=5t8GQNq4ETQ:UWkoQLUkHsw:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=5t8GQNq4ETQ:UWkoQLUkHsw:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techeye/security/~4/5t8GQNq4ETQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator>Matthew Finnegan</dc:creator>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://news.techeye.net/security/western-governments-eye-up-the-latest-spy-kit</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Mutating Android trojan changes form whenever it's downloaded</title>
      <description>In what could be an interesting case for Dr Who, Symantec has warned of a mutating Android trojan.</description>
      <link>http://feeds.techeye.net/~r/techeye/security/~3/4K4VKm8VPIw/mutating-android-trojan-changes-form-whenever-its-downloaded</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techeye.net/security/mutating-android-trojan-changes-form-whenever-its-downloaded</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:52:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Security</category>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>In what could</strong> be an interesting case for Dr Who, <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/company/symantec">Symantec</a> has warned of a mutating <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/product/android">Android</a> trojan.</p>
<p>The company has found a new premium-rate SMS Android trojan that modifies its code every time it gets downloaded.  This means that it can bypass antivirus detection.</p>
<p>It uses a technique known as server-side polymorphism and it has existed peacefully in the world of desktop malware for many years. Now, it seems that something in the mobile world has woken it up and reversing the polarity of the neutron flow does not seem to work.</p>
<p>According to Symantec, a special mechanism  runs on the distribution server which modifies certain parts of the trojan to ensure that every malicious app that gets downloaded is unique.</p>
<p>This is not the same as local polymorphism where the malware modifies its own code, nor is it the same as a polymorphic ring tone.</p>
<p>So far, Symantec has seen several variants of the trojan which it calls Android.Opfake.  All of them have come from Russian websites and it is believed that they had slumbered in the Siberian ice only to be awoken when a meteorite plummeted to earth .</p>
<p>The malware contains instructions to automatically send SMS messages to premium-rate numbers from a large number of European and former Soviet Union countries.</p>
<p>Writing in his <a href="http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/server-side-polymorphic-android-applications" target="_blank">bog, </a>Vikram Thakur, the principal security response manager at Symantec, said that more complicated polymorphism requires more intelligent countermeasures and, we guess, when you deal with them it is really important not to blink.</p>
<p>
<object style="height: 390px; width: 640px;" width="100" height="100" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/jKXLkWrBo7o?version=3&amp;feature=player_detailpage" type="application/x-shockwave-flash">
<param name="data" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jKXLkWrBo7o?version=3&amp;feature=player_detailpage" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jKXLkWrBo7o?version=3&amp;feature=player_detailpage" />
<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" />
</object>
</p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=4K4VKm8VPIw:do6Bh6it62U:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=4K4VKm8VPIw:do6Bh6it62U:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=4K4VKm8VPIw:do6Bh6it62U:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=4K4VKm8VPIw:do6Bh6it62U:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=4K4VKm8VPIw:do6Bh6it62U:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=4K4VKm8VPIw:do6Bh6it62U:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=4K4VKm8VPIw:do6Bh6it62U:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=4K4VKm8VPIw:do6Bh6it62U:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=4K4VKm8VPIw:do6Bh6it62U:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techeye/security/~4/4K4VKm8VPIw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator>Nick Farrell</dc:creator>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://news.techeye.net/security/mutating-android-trojan-changes-form-whenever-its-downloaded</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Camden Council threatens its constituents with shouting CCTV</title>
      <description>The London borough of Camden has been outed to have installed talking CCTV cameras in residential areas which literally threaten constituents outside their own homes.</description>
      <link>http://feeds.techeye.net/~r/techeye/security/~3/Up_1f7PYlAk/camden-council-threatens-its-constituents-with-shouting-cctv</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techeye.net/security/camden-council-threatens-its-constituents-with-shouting-cctv</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:47:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Security</category>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The London borough of Camden</strong> has installed talking CCTV cameras in residential areas which literally threaten constituents outside their own homes.<br /><br />The camera, spotted by London blog <em><a href="http://www.bigsmoke.org.uk/?p=35185" target="_blank">Big Smoke</a></em>, was found in a residential estate of the borough in a communal garden. When approached, it blasts out an American voice demanding residents "stop" as it's a "restricted area". It tells residents that their photograph is being taken and "will be sent for processing" if they don't "leave the area now".<br /><br />The <em>Big Smoke </em>blogger said in the video: "Absolutely outrageous, that's the camera there, telling me that MY communal garden is a restricted area, and that I, a person who lives over there, have to leave the area now. Camden Council do not have the power to make my home a restricted area and tell me to leave it."<br /><br />Another Camden resident was equally outraged. He told <em>TechEye</em>: "It is truly outrageous, it feels like the local community is being hounded. &nbsp;<br /><br />"First community support officers in the local area are allowed to confiscate your alcohol, now CCTV cameras are actually threatening residents.  It is hard to guess what could be next. <br /><br />"There may be problems with crime in certain areas, but to take pictures of honest members of the public outside their flat is a joke.   The council should remove these Orwellian spy cameras and help reduce crime affecting local residents rather than employing inanimate objects to hurl insults at them."<br /><br />Unfortunately, it looks like Camden is following a worldwide trend of surveillance rather than leading the charge. Despite evidence that even regular CCTV cameras do not work as a preventative measure, privacy campaigners at Big Brother Watch warn that the technology is "something we will see more and more of".&nbsp;<br /><br />Nick Pickles, director of privacy at Big Brother Watch, said to <em>TechEye</em>: "Camden Council needs to come clean on who took the ridiculous decision to install this equipment and why they felt it appropriate for an American voice to shout at residents warning their own garden was a restricted area.<br /> <br />"This kind of shouting camera is totally inappropriate for a residential area, unless Camden council&rsquo;s next plan is for all residents to be subject to a curfew?<br /> <br />"It is a sad indictment of the surveillance culture that has gripped many local authorities. We urge Camden to remove this equipment at the earliest opportunity and engage with residents about tackling any problems that exist on this estate."<br /><br />Camden Council spokespeople told <em>TechEye </em>that they are trying "to find out the details" and will get back to us.</p>
<p>&nbsp;<strong>*Update</strong> Camden Council has released a statement about the camera. It claims that all flash cameras have the ability to offer recorded messages and that this one was turned on by mistake.</p>
<p>Here is the full statement:</p>
<p>"Tackling antisocial behaviour is a top priority for Camden Council and we're committed to ensuring the safety and security of each and every one of our residents.</p>
<p>"The flash camera on Walker House estate was installed in September 2011 in response to an increasing number of concerns from residents on the estate and complaints of antisocial behaviour.</p>
<p>"All flash cameras have the capacity to deliver voice messages when activated but in this instance it appears that voice messages were inadvertently activated when the camera batteries were replaced four to five weeks ago.</p>
<p>"We do not want to stop residents from enjoying their open spaces and communal areas and under no circumstances would we want voice messages to be used in areas where they may be disturbed. The voice messages will be deactivated as soon as possible.</p>
<p>"Since the flash camera was installed, we have received various positive feedback from residents on the estate who have been pleased with the way it, along with increased housing patrols, has resulted in improvements to the place where they live.</p>
<p>"We have installed similar flash cameras as a temporary deterrent in a number of other locations across the borough. They have led to a number of antisocial behaviour orders being obtained as a direct result of evidence from the cameras.</p>
<p>"<a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/product/flash-player">Flash</a> cameras are only ever installed as a temporary measure and are always supported by deployment of other resources.</p>
<p>"We will only consider the use of technology as a deterrent when it can help tackle antisocial behaviour and offer value for money."<span>&nbsp;</span></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=Up_1f7PYlAk:vfFeR52v2Uk:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=Up_1f7PYlAk:vfFeR52v2Uk:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=Up_1f7PYlAk:vfFeR52v2Uk:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=Up_1f7PYlAk:vfFeR52v2Uk:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=Up_1f7PYlAk:vfFeR52v2Uk:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=Up_1f7PYlAk:vfFeR52v2Uk:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=Up_1f7PYlAk:vfFeR52v2Uk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=Up_1f7PYlAk:vfFeR52v2Uk:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=Up_1f7PYlAk:vfFeR52v2Uk:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techeye/security/~4/Up_1f7PYlAk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator>A staff writer</dc:creator>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://news.techeye.net/security/camden-council-threatens-its-constituents-with-shouting-cctv</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>DNSChanger trojan still infects Fortune 500 companies</title>
      <description>Two months after a traffic hijacking scheme was brought to its knees, the software that powered a botnet is still running on computers at half of the Fortune 500 companies, and on nearly 50 percent of all federal government agency PCs.</description>
      <link>http://feeds.techeye.net/~r/techeye/security/~3/qGgL1EzhYOU/dnschanger-trojan-still-infects-fortune-500-companies</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techeye.net/security/dnschanger-trojan-still-infects-fortune-500-companies</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:54:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Security</category>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Two months </strong>after a traffic hijacking scheme was brought to its knees, the software that powered a botnet is  still running on computers at half of the Fortune 500 companies, and on nearly 50 percent of all federal government agency PCs.</p>
<p>The "DNSChanger Trojan" changes the host computer's web settings to hijack search results and to block victims from visiting security sites that might help scrub the infections.</p>
<p>Inspector Knacker of the Estonian Yard fingered the collar of six men suspected of using the Trojan to control more than 4 million computers in over 100 countries. At the same time there was a coordinated attack on the malware's infrastructure.</p>
<p>Companies were supposed to be cleaning up their systems before some bright spark figures out a way of reactivating the network.</p>
<p>But according to <em><a href="http://krebsonsecurity.com/2012/02/half-of-fortune-500s-us-govt-still-infected-with-dnschanger-trojan/" target="_blank">Krebs on Security,</a></em>&nbsp; that cleanup process has been slow-going.</p>
<p>Insecurity company Internet Identity found evidence of at least one DNSChanger infection in computers at half of all the Fortune 500 firms, and 27 out of 55 major government entities.</p>
<p>Rod Rasmussen, president and chief technology officer at Internet Identity, said that there were some difficulties with removing this malware, but you would think people would want to get it cleaned up.</p>
<p>The FBI has warned that although it has a court order to replace the Trojan's DNS infrastructure with surrogate, legitimate DNS servers, the order will expire on 8 March, 2012.   When that expires the internet connection for infected servers will break completely.</p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=qGgL1EzhYOU:OqjlmgNAXA8:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=qGgL1EzhYOU:OqjlmgNAXA8:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=qGgL1EzhYOU:OqjlmgNAXA8:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=qGgL1EzhYOU:OqjlmgNAXA8:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=qGgL1EzhYOU:OqjlmgNAXA8:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=qGgL1EzhYOU:OqjlmgNAXA8:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=qGgL1EzhYOU:OqjlmgNAXA8:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=qGgL1EzhYOU:OqjlmgNAXA8:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=qGgL1EzhYOU:OqjlmgNAXA8:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techeye/security/~4/qGgL1EzhYOU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator>Edward Berridge</dc:creator>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://news.techeye.net/security/dnschanger-trojan-still-infects-fortune-500-companies</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Germany claims Chrome most secure browser</title>
      <description>Germany's state security experts have recommended that Windows 7 users run Google's Chrome browser.</description>
      <link>http://feeds.techeye.net/~r/techeye/security/~3/pzS8PttWIxA/german-endorses-chrome-as-most-secure-browser</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techeye.net/security/german-endorses-chrome-as-most-secure-browser</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:45:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <category>Security</category>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Germany's state security </strong>experts have recommended that <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/product/windows-7">Windows 7</a> users run <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/company/google">Google's</a> <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/product/google-chrome">Chrome</a> browser.</p>
<p>In a security best practices guideline, Germany's Federal Office for Information Security, known by its German initials of BSI, said Chrome was the best browser.</p>
<p>In its published advice, the BSI said that since the browser is the key component for the use of services on the Web, it is the main target for cyber-attacks.</p>
<p>It said that using Google Chrome in conjunction with other measures you can significantly reduce the risk of a successful IT attack.</p>
<p>The report cited Chrome's anti-exploit sandbox technology for special praise.  This technology  isolates the browser from the operating system and the rest of the computer.  It also liked Chrome's update mechanism and method of bundling <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/company/adobe">Adobe</a> <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/product/flash-player">Flash</a>,</p>
<p>The BSI has a lot of clout.  Two years ago it told Germans to stop using Internet Exploder and switch to <a class="entity-ref" href="http://www.techeye.net/product/firefox">Firefox</a>.  That move was credited with wiping out IE's dominence in the EU.</p>
<p>BSI also recommended Adobe Reader X because of its sandbox system  and urged citizens to use Windows' Auto Update feature to keep their PCs up to date with OS security fixes.</p>
<p>It also gave the nod to Secunia's Personal Software Inspector (PSI), a free utility that scan a computer for outdated software and points users to appropriate downloads.</p>
<p>At the moment Chrome has only 14.3 percent of all browsers used in Germany, while Firefox has 51 percent and IE accounts for 24.8 percent.<span>&nbsp;</span></p><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=pzS8PttWIxA:d9TDZKIJZ5Y:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=pzS8PttWIxA:d9TDZKIJZ5Y:TzevzKxY174"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=TzevzKxY174" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=pzS8PttWIxA:d9TDZKIJZ5Y:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=pzS8PttWIxA:d9TDZKIJZ5Y:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=pzS8PttWIxA:d9TDZKIJZ5Y:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=pzS8PttWIxA:d9TDZKIJZ5Y:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=pzS8PttWIxA:d9TDZKIJZ5Y:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.techeye.net/~ff/techeye/security?a=pzS8PttWIxA:d9TDZKIJZ5Y:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techeye/security?i=pzS8PttWIxA:d9TDZKIJZ5Y:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techeye/security/~4/pzS8PttWIxA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:creator>Nick Farrell</dc:creator>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://news.techeye.net/security/german-endorses-chrome-as-most-secure-browser</feedburner:origLink></item>
  </channel>
</rss>

